I don’t think there is anything I want to read badly enough to jump over to a separate browser. The same goes for .onion links. The topic would need to be very compelling, without a mirror on the “normal” internet.
Gemspace is in early days, but I find I like write there much more than in the open web. I've been using an http proxy so that I can post my writings here, and I wonder if I could, one day, just post a gemspace link.
Would you follow it? Links look like this: gemini://geminiprotocol.net/docs/specification.gmi
I don’t think there is anything I want to read badly enough to jump over to a separate browser. The same goes for .onion links. The topic would need to be very compelling, without a mirror on the “normal” internet.
Also, no tracking, no upvotes, no marketing, no status-hogging people, no BS. This is refreshing. People there talk about what they really want to talk about. You are not being sold as a product, or sold at, at all.
And certainly more content.
The stuff not readable without JavaScript isn’t worth reading anyway and that still leaves you with vastly more content than what’s available on Gemini.
I'm pretty sure that you'll get shot down (politely) the first few times, but the requests (and appearance of Gemini URIs) will give an indication of whether or not the protocol itself is gaining in usage.
I do have a Gemini browser installed on a few systems, but use it rarely for want of content or presentation of links. OTOH, I've watched the rise in prevalence of Mastodon / Fediverse links on HN with interest.